Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are fundamental aspects of good programme management and improve quality, accountability and learning.

 

 MONITORING humanitarian activities
Enables tracking of:

  • physical and financial progress 
  • ongoing priorities and allocation of resources
  • equitable distribution of benefits among affected groups 
  • acceptance and usefulness of project among affected groups
  • implementation problems and constraints
  • Separate data by gender, age and vulnerable groups to support impartiality.
  • Keep recording systems simple and only collect the information you need.
  • Draw on existing information sources and use shared collection processes.
  • Include affected groups in monitoring:

- engage them in defining objectives and indicators and information collection
- communicate results back to them

  • It is important that findings are acted upon and corrective actions taken.

Monitoring is a process that should continue through the life of the project.

 

 EVALUATING humanitarian action
Facilitates management, learning and accountability through:
  • determining impacts throughout the duration of the project (improvements/ changes) for the target population e.g. quality of life 
  • fulfiling compliance and accountability obligations e.g. to affected population, supporters, donors, senior management, other agencies 
  • generating real-time feedback from the affected population on the quality of response and organisational performance
  • Plan for the evaluation purpose and scope:

- What is the intended use and who are intended users of the evaluation?
- How much time and funding is available?
- What methodologies will be used?

  • Relate to the project or programme design and consider relevance, connectedness, coherence, coverage, efficiency, effectiveness and impact (OECD-DAC criteria) to the identified problems and needs.
  • Consider how and by whom the evaluation is to be conducted.

- What researcher / team qualities are required e.g. local network, language, acceptance by all?
- Could a joint evaluation be undertaken with others?
- Who should be involved and how e.g. women, children, marginalised groups?
- How and to whom will results be communicated?

  • Schedule evaluation to accommodate demands/constraints facing affected groups e.g. livelihoods, security restrictions.

  

 IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Conducted some time after project/programme completion impact assessment measures:

  • lasting changes in people’s lives, including unintended and negative impacts.
  • Relate to pre-disaster baseline information
  • Ask ‘What difference are we making?’
  • Define expected outcomes for partners and the affected population in the project design and incorporate in the evaluation
  • Assess the relative impact of different approaches NOT the overall impact of your organisation’s work.

 

This page was last updated on 24 June 2011