Managing Humanitarian Projects → Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are fundamental aspects of good programme management and improve quality, accountability and learning.
| MONITORING humanitarian activities |
Enables tracking of:
- physical and financial progress
- ongoing priorities and allocation of resources
- equitable distribution of benefits among affected groups
- acceptance and usefulness of project among affected groups
- implementation problems and constraints
|
- Separate data by gender, age and vulnerable groups to support impartiality.
- Keep recording systems simple and only collect the information you need.
- Draw on existing information sources and use shared collection processes.
- Include affected groups in monitoring:
- engage them in defining objectives and indicators and information collection
- communicate results back to them
- It is important that findings are acted upon and corrective actions taken.
|
Monitoring is a process that should continue through the life of the project.
| EVALUATING humanitarian action |
Facilitates management, learning and accountability through:
- determining impacts throughout the duration of the project (improvements/ changes) for the target population e.g. quality of life
- fulfiling compliance and accountability obligations e.g. to affected population, supporters, donors, senior management, other agencies
- generating real-time feedback from the affected population on the quality of response and organisational performance
|
- Plan for the evaluation purpose and scope:
- What is the intended use and who are intended users of the evaluation?
- How much time and funding is available?
- What methodologies will be used?
- Relate to the project or programme design and consider relevance, connectedness, coherence, coverage, efficiency, effectiveness and impact (OECD-DAC criteria) to the identified problems and needs.
- Consider how and by whom the evaluation is to be conducted.
- What researcher / team qualities are required e.g. local network, language, acceptance by all?
- Could a joint evaluation be undertaken with others?
- Who should be involved and how e.g. women, children, marginalised groups?
- How and to whom will results be communicated?
- Schedule evaluation to accommodate demands/constraints facing affected groups e.g. livelihoods, security restrictions.
|
| IMPACT ASSESSMENT |
|
Conducted some time after project/programme completion impact assessment measures:
- lasting changes in people’s lives, including unintended and negative impacts.
|
- Relate to pre-disaster baseline information
- Ask ‘What difference are we making?’
- Define expected outcomes for partners and the affected population in the project design and incorporate in the evaluation
- Assess the relative impact of different approaches NOT the overall impact of your organisation’s work.
|
This page was last updated on 24 June 2011